Peak road bodies unite in safe driving redraft call


ATA and AAA seek targets in National Road Safety Strategy

Peak road bodies unite in safe driving redraft call
An image used by the AAA, which emphasises that performance indicators are lacking

 

The lack of clear targets and other flaws have seen the Australian Trucking Association (ATA) and Australian Automobile Association (AAA) jointly push for a redrawn 2021-30 National Road Safety Strategy (NRSS).

Also central to their critique is what is described as a "severe lack of government accountability".

The two organisations expresses concern that the draft strategy does not take into consideration the failings of the last 10 years that independent inquiries found were largely due to a lack of federal government leadership and an oversight of road safety.

"The AAA and ATA submissions in response to the draft NRSS have highlighted the inadequacy of the proposed strategy and present a forceful case that it must be rewritten," ATA CEO Andrew McKellar says.

"The NRSS must be supported by measurable targets, as well as clear identification of who will be held accountable to ensure they are being met.

"Each item must also set out specified sub targets so it is clear what needs to be done and how exactly these targets will be achieved."

They believe the draft strategy risks "undoing the good work of last year’s federal Budget and appeared to ignore key recommendations from extensive relevant government and parliamentary inquiries".

"The Commonwealth last year took a major step forward, by attaching strings to the safety funding it hands to states, which was the first step needed to ensure state governments meet their safety-related obligations," AAA managing director Michael Bradley says.

"Now is not the time to let that progress slip.

"It is also a concern that the draft strategy doesn’t propose to use the national road toll as a measure of its progress or success; and it fails to include any other agreed performance indicators.

"If governments endorse a 2021-30 strategy that contains the same shortcomings as its predecessor, then we should not be surprised if it too fails to deliver the reduced rates of death and injury that Australians deserve and desire."


Read about how an unimpressed NatRoad views the draft NRSS, here


The AAA and ATA say that while it is clear the draft NRSS had significant weaknesses, it is important the process of review and development continued.

"While we congratulate the government on establishing an Office of Road Safety and recognising the leadership role they have to play, it is more critical than ever they seize the opportunity to ensure the next NRSS has clear targets, clear responsibilities, clear actions and clear penalties for those jurisdictions that don’t pull their weight," Bradley says.

The ATA submission calls for several additional measures for governments to adopt in the NRSS, including the need for speed management and post-crash care measures, as well as strengthened driver licensing and training for both heavy and light vehicle drivers.

"Stronger and more comprehensive truck driver licensing and training would result in safer roads, safer people, and safer companies," McKellar says.

"Training for novice car drivers in how to share the road safely with trucks would play a key role in improving driver behaviour and reducing the number of injuries and fatalities on our roads."

Bradley and McKellar agree that serious action must be taken and the NRSS be properly established to build a strong foundation for the future of road safety in Australia.

"The draft NRSS still has a long way to go if we are going to achieve our goals of reduced fatalities and injuries on our roads, and it is critical we work together with government and take the time to get it right," they say. 

 

You can also follow our updates by joining our LinkedIn group or liking us on Facebook

 

Trucks For Hire | Forklifts For Hire | Cranes For Hire | Generators For Hire | Transportable Buildings For Hire