MORE INDUSTRY NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
MORE TECHNICAL NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
RELATED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular
COMMENTED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular


By Brad Gardner | May 3, 2010

Trucking operator Baxter Transport is questioning the worth of sticking with the Intelligent Access Program (IAP) due to an inability to get a return on its investment.

Kel Baxter, who runs the NSW-based company, is still struggling to get higher mass limits (HML) access for his vehicles despite raising concerns about the scheme last year.

Baxter Transport was one of the first to enrol in IAP, spending $20,000 to install the technology and paying an $800 monthly fee.

Under IAP, trucking operators are promised HML access in NSW and Queensland if they agree to install monitoring technology to track vehicle movements.

“I’ve got five trucks in IAP and it is not paying its way,” Baxter says.

“I have no intention of putting more in.”

He blamed a continued lack of funding to assess routes and a lengthy application process for undermining IAP.

With councils unable to fund assessments, Baxter says he had to commit about $3,000 of his own money for an assessment.

“We had to pay to get a bridge assessed,” he says.

Baxter sought approval to run through an area with nine bridges and was told it would cost him $3,000 a bridge to assess. He refused to pay.

The operator was one of the first to enrol in IAP, which became mandatory in NSW on June 30 last year.

Baxter is hopeful a sub-committee of the Road Freight Advisory Council focused on access issues will resolve the problems plaguing HML.

The group involves representatives from government and industry and was set up by the Minister Assisting the Minister for Transport David Borger.

“It is cooperative forum between industry, state government and local government,” NatRoad CEO Bernie Belacic, who is part of the committee, says.

The Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) was last year accused of refusing to finance cash-starved councils and trying to make trucking companies pay for the scheme.

Junee, Cootamundra, Parks, Dubbo and Lachlan councils last year had to deny HML access because funding constraints meant they could not assess routes.

The RTA denied recommending to councils they charge trucking operators and said local governments were responsible for covering assessment costs.


COMMENTS (2)
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Personally, I dont fell sorry for any who have invested in this.What will HML mean?A further driving down of rates,thats what it will mean.Lets get serious, any little gain we ever get results in some mob then dropping the rates even more. B-Doubles killed a lot of the rates,and so will HML.Instead of worrying about gaining HML,purchase a calculator, calculate your REAL costs of running a truck, and actually price your jobs to get a reasonable return for your investment,that is a REASONABLE return,not 1 or 2%,try 20% as any good accountant would advise, else shove your money elsewhere where you will get a real return instead of slowly going brok. Dont agree?then join the mannways, the QFMs,the Fletchers, etc...they are all broke.
Have a nice day.
Comment by 16601840
posted 1 year ago
i agree, the last 100 metres of routes is what is making IAP not work for us, we continually get knocked back when requesting routes or get asked to fund the assesments. its got to the stage where we have given up trying.
i feel sorry for the businesses who have invested plenty thinking they were going to get some help from the RTA with route access only to find they have to deal with local councils who have no intention in letting heavy trucks through their council.

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT
Friday, February 10, 2012
Australasian Transport News - AT A GLANCE
Home News Subscriber Exclusives Diesel Prices Truck Sales Daily News Bulletin