MORE INDUSTRY NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
MORE TECHNICAL NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
RELATED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular
COMMENTED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular


By Brad Gardner | February 11, 2010

The much-anticipated court case to determine if drivers can be charged for negligently damaging company equipment may be delayed for as long as a year.

The stoush between the Transport Workers Union (TWU) and K&S Freighters was expected to be heard in February, but a spokesman for the TWU says both parties are yet to exchange evidence.

He says a hearing date will be set once that happens.

“Going on average timelines, I am advised that the case may not be heard for another nine to 12 months,” the spokesman says, referring to the process of the Federal Court, which will hear the matter.

TWU Federal Secretary Tony Sheldon announced in a press conference last year the union wanted an end to K&S’ policy of deducting money from a driver’s wage for damaged vehicles.

“This is the same as a bank blaming their employees if a computer or a chair breaks and then deducting their pay to pay for it. It is totally unreasonable,” Sheldon said at the time.

But K&S Managing Director Legh Winser says the operator is doing nothing wrong.

“To get the facts correct - it is legal to have employees pay for negligent damage. It is not legal to have them pay for third party damage,” Winser says.

Refusing to abolish the policy, Winser says it has helped end a culture of carelessness to company property and that damaged equipment causes extensive downtime and lost productivity.

“Cleary a driver cannot pay for a large accident as they would not have the financial capability to do so but for a very clearly defined and unquestionable negligent accident we are requesting the driver to pay,” Winser says.

Winser says the company’s approach has slashed its incident and accident rate by 60 percent, a figure he adds that the TWU “found extremely difficult to dispute”.


COMMENTS (3)
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Clearly taking responsibility for careless mistakes and dammages is the right thing to do.Company owners have families too, infact they have their own families and all the other families that they need to stay in business for.A no care no responsibility attitude is a real problem to companies who have a hard enough time just keeping every thing going.Insurance covers accidents but it won't cover the side ripped out of two tyres on the weigh brige while lighting up a smoke at the tip,or the smashed mirror on the tree, or the aircleaners ripped off or bent back on another tree.Caring is sharring.Share the responsibility.This will make drivers think a little more and take more care.... hopefully.
J.Mansfield
48 years
articulated licence 25 years
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Clearly taking responsibility for careless mistakes and dammages is the right thing to do.Company owners have families too, infact they have their own families and all the other families that they need to stay in business for.A no care no responsibility attitude is a real problem to companies who have a hard enough time just keeping every thing going.Insurance covers accidents but it won't cover the side ripped out of two tyres on the weigh brige while lighting up a smoke at the tip,or the smashed mirror on the tree, or the aircleaners ripped off or bent back on another tree.Caring is sharring.Share the responsibility.This will make drivers think a little more and take more care.... hopefully.
Comment by Darryl
posted 1 year ago
Good luck getting drivers K&S , I'm sure everyone wants to drive for someone that will sting them hard earned money from their family if they make a mistake in 60 hour plus weeks with poor driver ongoing training and induction programs, if any, as some are job agency casuals off the street.

Careless behaviour and a lack of respect for a company vehicle and equipment is obviously frowned upon within this industry and is obviously not a bonus for the owner of the equipment. But there is an old saying in this industry I once learnt from an old hand - If you pay peanuts you get monkeys. Perhaps a more competitive above award wage rate would attract a better quality of driver for K&S and prevent some of these incidents.

The biggest problem I've found in my short time in this industry is that large companies cut rates to get contracts and unfortunatley snowballs down to the driver's rate of pay and conditions. And at the end of the day the good drivers leave the company or contract to try and find a better payrate and better conditions. Then the monkeys come in.

Unfortunatley unless a government body creates a minimum rate for the tendering process on these contracts and enforces it according to CPI movements for the transport industry and allowances for an inflating wage rate for drivers currently on the contracts instead of a cut when these clowns over-sharpen their pencils, this will continue to happen.

Tanker Driver (26 year old)

TWU Union Member and co-delegate

BRISBANE QLD

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Australasian Transport News - AT A GLANCE
Home News Subscriber Exclusives Diesel Prices Truck Sales Daily News Bulletin