MORE INDUSTRY NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
MORE TECHNICAL NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
RELATED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular
COMMENTED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular

main image

By Brad Gardner | December 15, 2009

An advisory group made up of industry heavy-hitters has been tasked with delivering on the Rudd Government’s planned overhaul of the pay rates in the trucking industry.

ATN has obtained a letter from Industrial Relations Minister Julia Gillard naming the 12 members of the group responsible for developing a policy paper on the issue.

Although the names were not due to be released until later this week, the group will include Linfox, Scott’s Transport, Bluescope Steel and representatives from the Transport Workers Union (TWU).

The Queensland-based operator and a member of the Queensland Trucking Association, Tothag Transport, will also be at the table.

“The Safe Rates Advisory Group will provide a forum for confidential discussion at a senior level on key policy and practical issues related to safety in the transport industry,” Gillard writes.

The group will be chaired by industrial relations expert Scott Chamberlin, who is the former executive director of skills and workplace policy for the Housing Industry Association (HIA).

The CEO of the Victorian Transport Association (VTA) Phil Lovel (pictured) will also be part of the group, which includes fatigue management expert Professor Ann Williamson from the University of NSW and HB Higgins Chambers barrister Adam Hatcher. Paul Ryan, the VTA's industrial relations advisor, has also been given membership.

Gillard writes that the group will consider and build upon the recommendations of the National Transport Commission’s report into remuneration in the industry which found a link between safety and pay rates.

Gillard says the group will also look at ‘safe rates’ in the context of existing state and federal regulations and the Council of Australian Governments’ (COAG) decision to establish uniform transport laws.

The group will also need to consider the impact on safety and the well-being of drivers and other reviews and inquiries into pay rates.

This includes looking at the recommendations of an inquiry by Lance Wright QC and Professor Michael Quinlan in 2008 that criticised current pay practices and identified low pay with poor safety.

The first meeting will be held tomorrow in Melbourne, with no mention of when the policy paper will be available for industry comment.

The TWU has long argued that pressure from clients and poor pay has forced truck drivers to commit unsafe practices.

It wants urgent action from the Government to reform the industry and has kick-started a new campaign of planting crosses in public places to show how many people have died from truck-related incidents since the NTC issued its report.

Are these the right representatives to advise the Government on pay rates? What areas of the industry should they be looking at? Leave your comments below...

COMMENTS (10)
Comment by 17473025
posted 1 year ago
Irony
"Linfox hit with angry backlash from subcontractors after it slashed the freight rate under its deal with Carter Holt Harvey"
Not sure how th econtractors would feel reading these two articles together .
No Name
Comment by 17473025
posted 1 year ago
Where is the ATA the industry's peak body talk about politics?
Paul
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
when you get bid companies having buying power to buy trucks and fuel in bulk quantities for massive discounts they can afford to slash rates. these companies will only look after their own interests to in crease their shareholder profits and screw anybody else! this commitee will only serve to worsen the industry and there will be no benefit for an owner driver which is what safe rates should be aimed at .all paties named in this comittee are all rate cutters even blue scope steel.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
yes, this is once again a push by people who have made it to the top by exploiting others, the unrealistic expectations placed on all operators of trucks and drivers alike. Its not hard enough that we have to put up with freight forwarders paying you the minimum rate and on the other hand Federal and State laws and RTA officers hovering above you to give you a fine for a 15 min breach on a work diary ( the list of these petty breaches runs in the hundreds, just ask around) have we got time to contest these ? NO. because you see we need to keep working otherwise our jobs and homes and busineses are on the line. If we need to have another forum on pay rates and Safety issues we need to include the real people of the Industry not just our so called industy leaders. PLEASE GET THIS RIGHT " it seems to me the big players want the ordinary people to go down the shute so they will in turn end up with the lot" sounds reasonable ?
Comment by Jerry
posted 2 years ago
i will make a prediction now on one cost.
fuel will be based on an average of 2.2 cpl .
i argued this point on numerous accasions in meetings while ceo of aldoda , i fought for average of 1.7 which is still more than a lot of trucks average
so all you subcontractors you had better be prepared for a drop in rates
jerry brown-sarre
Comment by 16599674
posted 2 years ago
The composition of this group is appalling as it continues the situation where all key decision making road transport forums - government or industry - have next to no driver or owner driver representation!
Comment by Tony
posted 2 years ago
Finally someone in Government seems prepared to tackle the real issue driving poor safety and deaths - the pressure on drivers by clients. Let's keep the pressure on them to deliver a real system that means drivers get a fair deal for once.
Comment by 16978009
posted 2 years ago
What a waste of time and money this group will look after themselves once again and forget to pay the sub contractors a livable rate once again
Comment by 16624578
posted 2 years ago
NO! NO! and NO!
Before any majors or union decide on the pay rate they need a good look at the subcontractor rates as I have not seen a rate rise from them in over 10 years.
Safety is jeopadise when there is no money in the job and whilst most companies have no problem with a wage increase, a rate increase to companies needs to be address first only to keep drivers in a job. Because its the small transport operators wearing the brunt of the majors, as their small fortune is aquired from us.
It seems like the transport operator always has their hand in the pocket.

Name withheld
Comment by Jerry
posted 2 years ago
what an absolute joke
the same people who have set subcontractor rates for the past 60 years will now have more meetings to procrastinate the the issue further .we have long argued that the twu is not the body to represent owner drivers
where is the independant owner driver representaation
why didnt aldoda get a seat as the only group who truly represent owner drivers
these rates will only be based on major tpt company costs and there is no body on the committee to debate the major points
we have been there before
jerry brown -sarre

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Australasian Transport News - AT A GLANCE
Home News Subscriber Exclusives Diesel Prices Truck Sales Daily News Bulletin