MORE INDUSTRY NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
MORE TECHNICAL NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
RELATED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular
COMMENTED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular

main image

By Brad Gardner

Trucking operators have been warned to focus on safety at depots after Toll was fined more than $200,000 for the death of a truck driver.

Robert John Starr was folding a tarpaulin in the middle of a thoroughfare at Toll’s Wagga Wagga depot when he was run over by a truck at 1am in 2004.

The NSW Industrial Court heard Toll did not have a system of separating pedestrians and vehicles and failed to conduct a risk assessment of the depot, while Starr was not given an on-site safety induction.

The company pleaded guilty to breaching the Occupational Health and Safety Act and was fined $220,000, with Justice Trish Kavanagh saying the penalty should serve as a wake-up call to the industry.

“A rigorous approach is needed by all employers conducting work within the transport industry which involves the movement of such vehicles and this is especially so in their confined depot areas,” she says.

“An element of general deterrence is necessary in the consideration as to penalty to remind the industry of the necessary insistence on not only defined safe working models, but the performance of tasks in accordance with those safe working modules.”

Kavanagh accused Toll of ignoring safety standards because it knew drivers worked in the middle of a thoroughfare but did nothing to rectify the situation.

“There were obvious steps that could have been taken which, either singly or in combination, would have eliminated or reduced the risk,” she says.

Toll could have been fined up to $825,000 due to previous safety breaches, with Kavanagh saying the company “does not have a fine industrial record”.

But lawyers for the company questioned why other parties were not held liable for the accident because Starr was not a direct employee of Toll.

The court was told Starr worked for Wayne Lewis Transport, which provided safety vests and told its drivers to wear them when required.

Toll also wanted action taken against the driver who ran Starr over but its pleas were rejected because there was no evidence the driver was speeding.

“I accept the driver did not see Mr Starr who, by inference, was bent over his truck’s tarpaulin in the dark in a traffic carrying and not wearing a safety vest,” Kavanagh says.

The area also suffered from poor lighting and Kavanagh says there was no evidence the driver was speeding.

Since the incident Toll has installed additional lights, traffic lines, parking signs and designated work areas, while also reviewing its induction process and ensuring safety vests are worn.
COMMENTS (10)
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
This is another example of a worker being needlessly killed while going about their business. It never ceases to amaze me how the potential for death or serious injury continues to go unnoticed, unassessed and uncontrolled by those supposedly responsible for controlling the workplace or the work being undertaken.

Given Justice Kavanagh’s, I imagine those in the corporate mind of Toll would be uneasy and dread the prospect of having to appear before the courts to explain their actions (and Toll’s track record) in the future. The only reason I suspect that this wasn’t the case on this occasion, is that there mustn’t have been sufficient evidence to do so.....but this will not always be the case.

There is a litany of information and advice by OHS regulators across Australia to help businesses meet their responsibilities. We also have some of the strongest OHS law, largest penalties and active regulators in the world. But this accounts for nothing if those responsible for controlling the work and reaping the financial rewards, fail to take sufficient preventative actions.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Graeme Burke must be seeking work thru Tolls ! Too much faith has been put in Hi Viz Vests, If there is not enough lighting shining on them, they can be of little or no use, Nothing can replace well lit yards regardless of the cost, in the close confines of a busy transport depot or any dark workplace, Hi Viz Vests can create a "can`t see the forest for the trees" situation where by there are times the person not wearing the Hi Viz is the one that stands out the most. Often when staff see someone not wearing a Hi Viz is noticed more so and is avoided more causiously. Everyday, Everynight, Every transport company is in breach of safety regulations in some way or another, they are all hypocrytes. K.R. ohs rep.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
I feel deeply for both the family of the driver killed and the poor fellow who ran over him, who by the story here, was pursued by Toll seemingly as a scapegoat. I imagine he has been under extreme pressure all the time since the accident and also deep remorse on the whatif issue. "What if I had been 10 minutes later or earlier" etc. No one goes to work to have this happen. I only wish safety laws and procedures were set up more by those who have to work and abide by them, rather than by those who just tell others what to do.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
I respect a person who puts their name to a comment. The infrence that safety will cost jobs is a threat which must be challenged. Safety and compliance has a cost to business, but is the dollar worth more than a persons health or life? If the bottom line is so low that cost cutting means putting safety at less importance than the most important concern, then re-organise your financial situation. Your comment reinforces my initial comment that companies will budget for the fine as it is less than the compliance cost. Until the courts hand out fines which make safety and compliance a bargin then why would companies comply? I am sure if a non-transport person had been killed the media would have screemed about the hypocracy in the transport industry. In the article Toll said they should not be liable due to a diminished responsibility as the individuals were responsible for the incident. I disagree, because the individuals are agents for the principle. It is the responsibility of the company to change the culture, as the way we were taught to load trucks in the 1980's is now long gone. The yard was not set up appropiately,which was the major contributing factors to this death. Companies are in business to make money, but never at the cost of a person’s health or their life. I understand the balancing act, but if business was easy every one would do it. Richard Beardmore
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
I have read with great interest the story on the Driver killed in Tolls yard at Wagga. While I feel deeply sorry for the driver and his family does someone have to have their hand held and told to put a reflective vest on whilst working particularly at night and in an access way. Hi Vis equipment has been pushed down every drivers throat for the past 10 years. There is no subsitute for common sense. You can have all the inductions you like but nothing beats common sense. Safety is up to the individual. It was not surprising that Toll was fined as work cover NSW has a 98% success rate in court. Whilst NSW has had a field day with such laws in a very strong economy if drastic change is not made it will be interesting to see how the unemployment level in NSW will fair in this recession. Graeme Burke Managing Director Burkes Transport (Bathurst) Pty Ltd
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
This accident was the result of the Toll Groups' attitude to subcontractors. The way that Toll treats its subbies is ridiculous. All they see subbies as is a way to make easy money and bugger the consequences. I bet if a company driver did not wear his vest someone would have been on to him before he got out of the truck. Toll staff,employees and the union are only interested in what happens to the company personnel. If he had not had this terrible accident they probably would have banned the driver from the site.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
We all know that you have to wear a vest day and night wherever you go nowadays, even when no one is watching you. How about we start to take some responsibility for our own actions and stop blaming everyone else for our own laziness.
Comment by 13138321
posted 1 year ago
What does it take for the directors to cop their right wack...if this was a family business the directors would be wearing personal charges as well!
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Toll should have done that stuff before the accident. The laws have been around for years and it is typical of the transport industry to be reactionary. This man died because the law is NOT being enforced and the companies know it. Where was Work Safe before the accident, where was the site OH&S committee? When will the judges of this country stop being 'nice' and start closing down these companies who budget the penalties they might have to endure? I have not driven over anyone in my 25+ years of driving, so if I kill a person on the way home tonight will this judge will reduce my punishment because of good behaviour.....I doubt it. Oh yes I must remember I'm not a major company who pays lots on money to political parties. My heart breaks for the family of that man who died, and the family of the man who ran him over. They are the real victims of laws which are pathetic.
Richard Beardmore
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
About time. Toll only care about money and have no consideration for other transport operators. This attitude of Toll's is Australia wide. Toll are very good at 'passing the buck' and 'playing the blame game'.

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT
Saturday, September 04, 2010