MORE INDUSTRY NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
MORE TECHNICAL NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular
RELATED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular
COMMENTED STORIES...
most recent
|
most popular


Trucking operators will be barred from using Higher Mass Limits unless they commit to the Intelligent Access Program (IAP), NSW Roads Minister Michael Daley says.

Companies have until June 30 to install GPS monitoring technology in heavy vehicle cabs or risk losing access to more than 10,000 kilometres of road across NSW.

Daley says IAP will track heavy vehicles to ensure they do not travel on routes or bridges incapable of supporting trucks.

He says businesses signed up to IAP will increase their productivity because IAP allows vehicles such as B-doubles, road trains, B-triples and AB-triples to carry heavier loads on specified routes.

“The program gives heavy vehicles access to 14,000 kilometres of the state road network,” Daley says.

“There are also significant economic benefits by allowing transport operators to safely carry heavier loads on approved routes.”

In what he says is a win-win situation for the industry and communities, Daley claims the regulatory scheme will result in safer and more modern and efficient trucks operating on NSW roads.

Daley claims more than 3500 heavy vehicle operators have registered an interest in IAP, but says they must act now to ensure they have the necessary equipment by the June deadline.

“Operators must sign a contract with a service provider, have the technology installed, and receive their permit before the end of June to maintain HML access,” Daley says.

Transtech Driven and Minorplanet Asia Pacific have been accredited as service providers by Transport Certification Australia (TCA), which administers IAP.

The monitoring scheme is also being rolled out across Queensland and Victoria, with the latter extending IAP to concrete pump trucks and cranes.

COMMENTS (9)
Comment by Unknown
posted 11 months ago
WE have been dudded we are encouraged to join IAP to gain more access to the Roads network. Lot of bullshit for instance the coast rd Brisbane to Sydney s not designated Mass route. If you load 40 ton in Cairns to go to Sydney the only way to get there is Brisbane Dubbo-Sydney what a lot of crock they are giving us nothing all smoke and mirrors.
Comment by John
posted 1 year ago
I think its time that NTC was done over on conflict of interest grounds - TMC came from them, was originally and is still run by ex-NTC, and shares the same floor in Melbourne - Level 15, 628 Bourke Street.
And then go Daley as well as being part of the same conflict through blackmailing truckies.
Where's any cases showing HML trucks have wrecked bridges or pavements in a catastrophic manner - if there are none how do they justify treating truck operators like terrorist suspects or serial paedophiles - monitoring their movements continually
Comment by Kevin
posted 1 year ago
The IAP is another government 'leg up' for the National Carriers; the small operators will not be able to compete against them if extra mass is available to IAP compliant operators only, the qualification criteria alone will exclude most small operators, this whole scheme is designed eliminate competition in the market place, and the ‘powers that be’ think we are too dumb to see it.
Mick Pattel
Comment by 73301
posted 1 year ago
I have no problem with IAP as a monitoring tool, and GPS as a management tool is very useful in any transport buisness. The issue I have is that restricting the IAP system access to two providers (to date)is a restraint of trade in anyone's language and should be challenged. There are many responsible transport companies who have been using GPS for a number of years who may not want to incur (or can afford) the added expense of changing to an "approved" IAP provider. The NSW Govt. needs to review its positionn on this or potentially face a legal challenge.
Mark.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
I like the way that government makes the IAP providers viable through legislation and if it wasnt for the legislation how many providers would there be? I also doubt that the government has the systems and people in place to manage the whole thing anyway.
Comment by John
posted 1 year ago
I think its time that NTC was done over on conflict of interest grounds - TMC came from them, was originally and is still run by ex-NTC, and shares the same floor in Melbourne - Level 15, 628 Bourke Street.
And then go Daley as well as being part of the same conflict through blackmailing truckies.
Where's any cases showing HML trucks have wrecked bridges or pavements in a catastrophic manner - if there are none how do they justify treating truck operators like terrorist suspects or serial paedophiles - monitoring their movements continually
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
The IAP Laws will do nothing for the Companies or the drivers in managing fatigue and making the roads an even safer place to travel. The IAP system is a regulatory body use system only.
WHAT ABOUT THE DRIVERS AND COMPANIES TRYING TO FIGHT FATIGUE AND MANAGE IT PROPERLY
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
At a premium cost for the hardware and then the IAP cost per month. Something tells me that the politicians still live in glass houses and don't understand the cost of ALL the new compliance structures and that we are still trying to recover from the fuel rip off of the Oil Companies. Perhaps they haven't had their overdraft cut back and have not got debitors slow to pay or going broke. Yes its easy to look at the figures and say its good but there are some reality issues to consider before the big stick is produced. Perhaps Mr. Daley could look at the empty coffers of the NSW state and realise owners can't print money and going broke is just that "GOING BROKE" and we can't blame anyone else can we.
Comment by Aj & T
posted 1 year ago
Another 'do it or else' we wave the big stick at you tactic, at what point do we jack up against the way these things are thrown at us.

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT
Saturday, September 04, 2010